Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 380278
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-24
Hmmm...
This is a pretty windoze-centric article. Easy to use? Easy to maintain? There are thousands of corporate and independent troubleshooters out there making a living from the fact that Microsoft's operating system is code-heavy and cumbersome. 'Nuff said on that!
Otherwise, although NOT so elitist as to write a book about how "in the beginning there was the line command" it's pretty lowest-common-denominator to refuse to learn ANYthing about the inner workings of software. Most people don't know anything about how their car's differential works either! But to assume that people need to rate the operability of any operating system on its "user-friendliness" is pretty damn insulting to anyone's intelligence!
Lastly, there are lots of Linux distros that aim for use by the more casual user: Mepis is quite nice (if hooked on KDE!) and Puppy is good for beginners, while gOS is targeted from get-go at the user new to any sort of computer. Articles like this one are sort of a waste of bandwidth!