Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Permalink for comment 380477
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: user-friendly
by l3v1 on Tue 25th Aug 2009 07:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: user-friendly"
Member since:

Incidentally, this is not a problem with ui design but rather your usual buggy software

Exactly, but for most "users" that is "user-unfriendly", since they don't see and don't care how or why it doesn't work, and they don't want to spend any time or effort for finding it out. That'd be ok, but instead of using what they'd feel more friendly, they come out and start complaining how bad that is, and wondering how come this sw, app, os, etc. doesn't live up to their expectations. It should be understood that if you get something for nothing then your demands should be requests, your complaints should be reports, and lacks in usability should be amended with your friendliness and will to contribute - if not with dev or support, then with patience and some effort.

Reply Parent Score: 3