
A reader asks:
Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks?
My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Member since:
2005-06-30
My initial message was: "If installing software outside the main repositories of a distro was such a non-issue, people wouldn't raise it as an issue."
The only claim I've made was that a centralised repository system isn't perfect, as you depend on the maintainers. If the maintainers don't care about your software, you're out of luck.
A few months. You don't even know what you're talking about, yet you keep telling me I'm wrong?
I never said this specific case was a deal-breaker. However, you claimed that getting software outside repositories is a rarity, yet a significant part of my software is customly installed on my system.
I don't think I'd represent the average user, but does that make this a non-issue? Should we only consider average web-surfin' grandmas?
Geez, I'm sorry to be a Linux user that doesn't think like you... Seriously, why would I bother with such futile discussion if I had no personal motivation?