Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Permalink for comment 380581
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I don't think anybody has stated we need to stick with X forever. X just doesn't seem to be broken enough to warrant pouring actual development money on the alternatives.

^ this, precisely.

Of all of X's inherent flaws, (and unfortunate tradeoffs) which no one ever mentions in these little discussions, none of them is so bad that it's worth it to go back square one.

I doubt Linux will be the OS we're all using in 20 years and I doubt X will be the graphics layer we're using in 20 years. Neither is the be-all or end-all of its field. When they are replaced it will be because there's something better that's working, not because we hate them.

Reply Parent Score: 2