Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Aug 2009 19:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 381031
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-27
One point missing thus far from the discussion is that GNU/Linux and BSD systems offer their users much more choice than Windows or Mac when it comes to desktop environments.
Don't like Gnome or KDE? No problem. There's also the following, each of which has a look and feel distinct from the two mentioned above:
Xfce (modelled on CDE)
Enlightenment
WindowMaker (modelled on NextStep)
Wmii (tiling wm)
Rio (as part of Plan 9 from User Space)
Fluxbox (minimalist, but easy to use and configure)
twm (minimalist, but it may pleasantly suprise you once you master it.)
...and possibly hundreds of other window managers.
Edited 2009-08-27 20:02 UTC