Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Aug 2009 22:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 381032
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
This is a common misconception that a developer need make there program work on each individual distribution that happens to use a Linux kernel. The reality is that they need only make there program compile with modern libraries. It is the responsibility of the distribution providers to insure it works and is packaged for there product. There is also no end to the examples of software with retail value sold for use on Linux based platforms.
This doesn't relate to the FSF point of your comment though. It is only offered to clarify your idea that developing for non-Windows systems is somehow more complicated.