Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Aug 2009 17:08 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Permalink for comment 381197
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-15
Yes because all those can be easily updated thru WSUS. Firefox in other hand can't. There is no way to update Firefox in huge corporations, unless you package every patch which ofc costs money. And if you say Firefox has internal update method I won't bother answering. "
So what about all those thousands of *OTHER* non-Microsoft programs that can be WSUS updated? I seem to recall that they can be easily packaged... and rolled out. In fact, I just worked on a corporate rollout of Adobe products and some kind of "Oracle" product... that you know... is some kind of small Enterprise Resource system. Also included was something stupid called "Groupwise"... oh along with about 40 other packages that were all updated to current revs.
Took us about 5 hours to finalize the changes and set them to roll in the wee hours of the morning.
So, what is this "Can't be deployed via WSUS" comment? I need more words to understand your conceptual misinformation better.