Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Sep 2009 21:21 UTC
And the Apple vs. Psystar case continues to roll onwards. A lot of mud is going back and forth between the two companies: Apple has accused Psystar of making information public which was under a protective order, and obviously, Psystar denied. In addition, Groklaw's Pamela Jones continues to suspect that this Psystar case is related to the SCO case, and is part of a concentrated effort to destroy the GPL. Update: I've just been emailed (on behalf of Psystar's lawyers, actually) the outcome (in the form of a court order) of the hearing held this morning. Sadly, it's very late here, so I won't be able to analyse it properly until tomorrow.
Permalink for comment 382649
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-01-04
I realize that things have been somewhat problematic over the weekend.
Have you had time to look at the ruling?
Do you have a comment to offer or a post that contains the information so that we might look at it?
TIA