Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Sep 2009 23:27 UTC
Legal Late last week, we discussed the Apple vs. Psystar case (again), and in that article several points were raised which would be handled during a hearing Friday morning. Right after publishing said article, the law firm working for Psystar sent a general email to members of the press (including Groklaw and OSNews, among others) which contained the court order which resulted from this hearing. So to finalise these issues, let's walk through them so we can put the lid on this case for a while.
Permalink for comment 382852
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by JayDee
by bfr99 on Tue 8th Sep 2009 19:13 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by JayDee"
bfr99
Member since:
2007-03-15

Lets cut to the chase. A buyer wanting to save money by running Apple software on cheaper non Apple hardware is perfectly reasonable. However trying to justify it by claiming without evidence that this will benefit Apple's profits is not only unbelievable but insulting to a very successful Apple management.

Reply Parent Score: 2