Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Sep 2009 22:38 UTC, submitted by EvilWells
debtree, posted an article showing the evolution in size of the GNOME desktop environment in recent Debian releases. The picture he paints isn't particularly pretty: the default GNOME install has increased drastically in size over the years.
Permalink for comment 382854
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-30
I don't think it would create de facto compatibility problems if standards were imposed upon userland software.
Out of my mind, right now there are the following libraries on my system which are duplicated (I spent a some time minimizing the number of dependencies on my system).
libid3tag
id3lib
taglib
gnutls
openssl
libmcs
xfconf
libmpg123
libmad
cdparanoia
libcdio
mac
ffmpeg
audiofile
libsndfile
libarchive
libzip
libexif
exiv2
libdownload
curl
libsoup
libgsasl
cyrus-sasl
gstreamer
xine
* other misc. cruft:
boost
* some more are being worked on as we speak
thunarvfs
libsexy
libglade
gtk+
It's just crazy. I bet I'd be using less than 64Mb of RAM at bootup after one of each of these is decided upon.