Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Sep 2009 22:29 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Permalink for comment 383174
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
However, having said that, it is still important that open source doesn't abandon those people who have nvidia hardware, IMO.
For that reason, even though I wouldn't get nvidia hardware myself, I still applaud the efforts of the Nouveau project.
But the problem is with the Nouveau is the impression I get is the same I get from Wine. It sounds very nice to do it for compatibility reasons but it can be a double edged sword. Through the continued development of Nouveau Nvidia can easily keep the status quo and claim they don't have to cooperate because the OSS world is doing fine and dandy.
Still, it works well enough for desktop use such that Fedora have been able to adopt it for the default desktop. Even if you don't like nvidia, this is still a good thing for users.
Like I said, Nouveau is a double edged sword.
Then again, I question how many end users have Nvidia GPU's given that most of the time I come across people with Intel X3100 or X4500 in their laptops.
Mind you, I might be proven wrong and because of the additional infrastructure put in place within Linux that more companies are willing to open up specifications.