Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Sep 2009 16:28 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Permalink for comment 384199
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Sorry, but this is completely untrue. At the time, SCO was shaking their legal fist at everyone involved with UNIX or GNU/Linux. Sun was *legally required* to license certain rights from SCO. Remember that Sun is a publicly traded company, so unlike most GNU/Linux distributions has a lot more legal requirements to worry about.
They did not "fund SCO" anymore than customers of SCO that licensed copies of SCO Unix did.
Edited 2009-09-15 20:51 UTC