Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Sep 2009 14:56 UTC
Mac OS X While Snow Leopard includes some improvements in the area of security, noted security researcher Charlie Miller, winner of two consecutive "Pwn2own" hacker contests and co-author of The Mac Hacker's Handbook, concludes that Apple missed the boat on security in Mac OS X Snow Leopard. "Snow Leopard's more secure than Leopard, but it's not as secure as Vista or Windows 7," Miller said.
Permalink for comment 384604
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by Hakime on Thu 17th Sep 2009 09:55 UTC
Member since:

My point is windows 7 is no more secure than other OS but still better that older versions

Well I agree with that in general besides that windows 7 will ship with a vulnerability allowing code injection (i know that the Microsoft Security Essentials detect the UAC exploit as a malware but it is quite easy to bypass that and it is already the case). So again claiming that Windows 7 is more secure than any other OS, being OS X, Linux or Vista makes little sense when in the same time this OS ships with a vulnerability known publicly.

One so called expert opinion does not reflect the industry state, so instead of flaming you should take it with a grain of salt.

Come one, flaming? Expressing a point a view is not flaming particularly when it tries to put some truth in the mass of nonsense that we read every day.

Miller calls himself a security expert, so as such, he should behave professionally and really says what it is about. Pretending that Apple does nothing or little for security with OS X is wrong, right? Therefore I consider him as a jackass regardless the technical background that he has. And he has a big one, this guy presumably knows very well OS X, and so he should talk professionally instead of throwing into the air sensational statements.

"Yourlink about sand-boxing also point that Apple api for sand-boxing kinda lack in the documentation departement."

Absolutely, nothing is perfect....

Edited 2009-09-17 09:57 UTC

Reply Score: 2