Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Thu 17th Sep 2009 05:32 UTC, submitted by ebasconp
Permalink for comment 384651
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I seem to remember that originally a key motivation in forking DFly from FreeBSD was Matt Dillon's (DFly founder and leader developer) disagreement over their SMP strategy. DFly has been engineered to support multiprocessing in a quite different way to most other contemporary OSes. But as far as I could tell from reading the Dragonfly BSD Digest (http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/ - a very interesting blog) this work has not yet been completed.
The emphasis seems to have shifted to clustering work etc. It's interesting stuff, to be sure, but I'd still like to see the final results of the SMP strategy.
Their HAMMER filesystem looks very interesting, though. The "high level journaling" stuff looked really cool as well but I don't know to what extent they use that currently.
I'd be quite interested to see a summary of what Dragonfly's benefits are *now* over other OSes.