Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Sep 2009 19:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 386917
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-05
If Google's problem is in their bundled apps, nothing stops the guy to release a new ROM without those apps. Advanced users will install them very easy if they need them. Unfortunately if Google doesn't like the process of making a custom ROM itself, this might be a problem. I use a custom ROM on my Windows Mobile handset and I love it. If one day I have an Android based device, I would definitely use a custom one - they are IMHO always better.
Big vendors never care too much about the details, performance or anything in particular - they produce "good enough for everyone" image, which doesn't fit the most advanced users. As somebody pointed out - those 2% are nothing.
...and Thom, I really like your style - I just imagined how my device "blows up in puffs of fairy dust"
Edit: I just saw the original article as well as the blog post. Google doesn't want their apps inside. Modding is permitted. So - build a ROM without their "Google Experience" apps. Problem solved
Edited 2009-09-29 22:36 UTC