Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Sep 2009 19:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 387016
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-22
>> I'm sure Google would have absolutely zero issues with an individual packaging replacement software with identical functionality.
Yes, and no... at the same time.
I'm a G1 owner and I use the Cyagonen image. To be able to use it, I had to hack the phone... downgrade it, exploit a bug and install the new image. That SUCKS. I could do the same with the dev edition without hacking it, but I can't buy it from my country.
But... why the hell I need a different image? Well... because google's image is intensionally crippled... no Thetering? No file transferring bluetooth? No fricking download of non-android files (try to download a .zip file just so you can copy it to a internet-less computer later)...
Google should never ever accept this from HTC/T-Mobile/Whatever....... That was the main advantage of open-source: things are made to help the user, not to be in his way. I hope Palm and Nokia don't do the same...
Too bad the OpenMoko project was not a success.
Edited 2009-09-30 11:42 UTC