Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 1st Oct 2009 21:02 UTC
We reported earlier on a blog post entitled "Ubuntu Report Card (2009)" where the author detailed how they felt the Ubuntu experience had improved over the years. In a follow-up series of articles looking at the future, Tanner Helland has written 10 different broadly-scoped feature requests that [he] 'and many others would like to see by the time Ubuntu 10.10 rolls around'.
Permalink for comment 387719
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I real like the windows and os x model: just a standard set of apis and libs and all apps linked with the standard apis. That way you won't have dependency or compatibility issues and you can download & run a software because you don't need to download other libs or packages.
That doesn't happen because of any single set of libs, but rather because of static compilation and bundling any required library with the application (thus lib duplication).
You can do the same on Linux if you wish (some do that already, eg. adobe and google).
On the other hand linux's package managers allow to actually share libraries between apps instead of bundling them with every app (hence all the dependencies), something that on Windows would be just impossible.
Member since:
2007-03-06
That doesn't happen because of any single set of libs, but rather because of static compilation and bundling any required library with the application (thus lib duplication).
You can do the same on Linux if you wish (some do that already, eg. adobe and google).
On the other hand linux's package managers allow to actually share libraries between apps instead of bundling them with every app (hence all the dependencies), something that on Windows would be just impossible.