Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Oct 2009 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 388798
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-07
Well, everyone has its tastes.
I hate the 2007 UI. The ribbon is a something for play-skool with its icons.
Well-organized traditional menus are just more powerful. Maybe for the basic features you need some more training, but those are in the toolbar too.
It is what I like about OO.org! Sadly I have seen screenshots of them copying the ribbon in the upcoming releases.
For me OO.org has only one fault: bad MS-Office compatibility. I need to be able to load and save a doc, xls or ppt file in an office suite. The files come from customers, colleagues, they can use Office 2003, 2007... I can't enforce that. I need to be able to load, modify and re-save that file.
If this operation messes up graphics, settings... then it is of no use.
For my "own" work, sure it is fine. It has more features than I need (Exactly like MS-Office). BUt that is different, for my personal work I can choose also other programs.