Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Oct 2009 18:24 UTC, submitted by Lazarus
Permalink for comment 389096
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Because FreeBSD make nothing worthwile of it's own accord ... Otherwise you would have named them by now.
There is nothing Friendly or competitive about anything BSD. One BSD out of all of them as ported this Apple technology.
GNU/Linux receive all it's funding by it's own commercial entity and those that work on it, we would be in the place of all irrelevant BSD if we received no funding and made nothing commercial or our own.
The real difference is our commercial entity work at making GNU/Linux better and share the work and profits with all others.
dtrace->SystemTrap
ZFS->btrfs
GCD->(I wonder if this will be re-invented also...)
You showed that BSD's don't include all the better technology, just the one it likes. as opposed to GNU/Linux who use Free Software.
GNU/Linux will never be insignificant, irrelevant, dependent on other crumb for the majority of it's advancements or in better words BSD.