Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Oct 2009 22:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 389394
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-01
So in one article it's mentioned that a)it would be nice to know if MorphOS 2.4 works on non-Mini G4 Macs and b)that there's a dearth of non-mainstream OS articles on OSNews. These comments were made by the article author and editor of the site.
Here's a crazy idea, contact the MorphOS devs and conduct an interview that you could post. This would allow you to get direct and correct answers to your questions and provide you with content for the site. It would certainly be more interesting and informative than asking a random collection of viewers to try an OS on hardware that is not officially supported. The best you're going to get in this fashion is a bunch of comments of "Nope, doesn't work" or "Well, it kind of works". There's no context to those responses, though. No answer to "Why?". The devs could give you your hardware list and explain to you the through process(es) behind the decision.
This article represents a huge missed opportunity, truly.