Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Oct 2009 22:03 UTC, submitted by mbpark
Permalink for comment 389924
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
To me, porting it to x86 seems to me like the most illogical next step to take. First of all, what is the point of x86, if the OS supports just a very limited hardware configuration? No, if they are to be truly serious about making AmigaOS a world-class competitor (which I'm not sure is their goal anyway), then there is only one way to go: the embedded/mobile/ultra-low-power segment, whether on PPC or ARM. It is in this segment that AmigaOS has its biggest advantage, because it's insanely fast and lean, plus in this segment a limited, well-defined hardware platform is the norm.
ARM would probably be best, since it's seeing tremendous growth right now. Still, PPC isn't dead yet in the embedded space, either. Witness the Cell--actually, wasn't there already some talk about a port to it?
Sure, x86 might be nice so you can test it out on your desktop, but that's what emulators are for, no? AmigaOS is so fast that even in an emulator things are likely to fly.
Edited 2009-10-18 09:17 UTC