Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Oct 2009 12:06 UTC, submitted by ebasconp
OpenBSD As mentioned in the release announcement: "Many people have received their 4.6 CDs in the mail by now, and we really don't want them to be without the full package repository. We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.6. This is our 26th release on CD-ROM (and 27th via FTP). We remain proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote holes in the default install." I really want news like this on the front page, but sadly, the long list of improvements makes no sense to me - I don't know what's important and what isn't. If someone can provide a nice readable summary of the most important improvements, I'll include it to the item and place it on the front page. There we are.
Permalink for comment 390036
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

If OpenBSD is more secure than most OS, then maybe it would make sense to run it inside VirtualBox, and only access internet via OpenBSD? Then a hacker has to break through OpenBSD and then also the underlying OS?

Or is this pointless? What do you say?

Since you asked, I'd say this is pointless, regardless of the guest operating system and the host operating system, the latter perhaps to a lesser extend.

Given the context, I've understood that the OpenBSD team quite firmly believes that no real security can be achieved via virtualization. Many agree with them and others who argue similarly, but this is a big open debate of course.

Pile of x86 crap on pile of x86 crap can not make a pile of secure crap.

EDIT: odd sentence.

Edited 2009-10-19 14:44 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2