Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 19th Oct 2009 12:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 390139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-01-20
WOW..

Its amazing to think whilst users actually gave a damn about how productive software was 10 years ago, that these days all users care about are the technical specifications. If you guys think that 64bit support will change your life in any way, I hate to shock you, but it probably wont. But sure, boycott 32bit software if you want (because it will make SUCH a major impact for a consumer movie editing package that probably would have trouble using 1GB of RAM), but maybe also stop and ask yourselves, what would be gained, other then the smug satisfaction that your memory usage is less efficient, and encoding is slightly (but barely noticeably) faster.
It looks interesting. After the release of Windows 7, I am actually strongly considering upgrading our iMac to Windows 7(because OSX has so many weird bugs).Unfortunately, it is too expensive (compared to iLife) for me to use this. It simply isn't cost effective