Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 390528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-13
Nope. Wrong wrong wrong wrong.
See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY
Everything I said is correct, you cant debunk any of it. You are a bold-faced liar.
I have used every windows NT from NT 3.1. There is nothing new here. The interface is, to me, an effective regression.
Sorry. New windows fanbois are not a decent source of information.
Nobody cares, upgrades wont sell well, all sales numbers will be tied to new hardware sales.
Ding, fries are done.