Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 390623
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
It's because their success isn't attributed to being a superior offering, rather it's something plagued by endless bugs and it's only the established monopoly that kept them going. Comes as no surprise that they don't know where to go next, they never had original ideas in the first place.
The flip side is that removing or moving all backwards compatibility is a monumental task that won't give any benefits given the sheer diversity of software people tend to use and how much of that software likes to tie itself so deep into the OS...