Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Oct 2009 18:08 UTC, submitted by JayDee
Permalink for comment 390804
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-11-04
No, it's not. Even IF it would be a breach of contract, it would not be illegal. "
Why is it called Contract Law then? If breaching a contract isn't breaking the law all contracts are invalid because there would be no recourse if you breached them. It isn't breaking CRIMINAL law, but it certainly IS breaking CIVIL law, which is why they are presently in court.
Does that spell it out simply enough for you to understand Thom? [/q]
Actually if you break a contract you do not break contract law! That is a big difference. You could possibly break contract law by making a contract which is forbidden by contract law, but by breaking the contract you are not breaking contract law.
Your definition of illegal also goes counter to how the term is used everywhere. Next thing is you're telling me people are doing something illegal when they default on their mortgage payments, or when they allow their neighbours to use their wireless/broadband internet ... All these are breaking contracts not laws!