Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Oct 2009 21:13 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Mac OS X John Siracusa, the Mac OS X guru who writes those insanely detailed and well-written Mac OS X reviews for Ars Technica, once told a story about the evolution of the HFS+ file system in Mac OS X - he said it was a struggle between the Mac guys who wanted the features found in BeOS' BFS, and the NEXT guys who didn't really like these features. In the end, the Mac guys won, and over the course of six years, Mac OS X reached feature parity - and a little more - with the BeOS (at the FS level).
Permalink for comment 390858
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
SterlingNorth
Member since:
2006-02-21



Neither of them mentioned HFS+. When Linux has Creative Suite, Microsoft Office, better hardware and software selection from big name vendors - then I'll give the slightest toss what people like you think of Apple or Microsoft.
"

Um, yes the first one does mention HFS+

To quote:
"I don't think they're equally flawed - I think Leopard is a much better system," he said. "(But) OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary."

Reply Parent Score: 2