Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Oct 2009 21:13 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Mac OS X John Siracusa, the Mac OS X guru who writes those insanely detailed and well-written Mac OS X reviews for Ars Technica, once told a story about the evolution of the HFS+ file system in Mac OS X - he said it was a struggle between the Mac guys who wanted the features found in BeOS' BFS, and the NEXT guys who didn't really like these features. In the end, the Mac guys won, and over the course of six years, Mac OS X reached feature parity - and a little more - with the BeOS (at the FS level).
Permalink for comment 390885
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai
by Marquis on Sat 24th Oct 2009 19:47 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai"
Member since:

I wonder if apple is looking at using WAPBL

While this may seam like a bad idea. Think about the fact they already have UFS support . Getting UFS2 support and WAPBL would make a good fit. They are both BSD licensed supported and incredibly stable.

Reply Parent Score: 2