Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Oct 2009 12:51 UTC
Editorial A couple of years ago, a professor at my university had a very interesting thought exchange with the class I was in. We were a small group, and I knew most of them, they were my friends. Anyway, we had a talk about language purism - not an unimportant subject if you study English in The Netherlands.
Permalink for comment 391152
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Thom has a point... - case law?
by jabbotts on Mon 26th Oct 2009 14:54 UTC in reply to "RE: Thom has a point..."
jabbotts
Member since:
2007-09-06

Maybe you could point to the case law which shows that Psystar is in fact committing criminal acts through the breaking of copyright law... cause.. I'm not seeing any definitive ruling out of that case yet nor am I seeing any past case law that strongly indicates it. Last I checked, courts where still deciding if Psystar is in fact an illegal business. Maybe we should wait until that claim is made by law before we make that claim; be if fact or opinion.

One may not agree with Psystar is doing and that's fine but claiming a legal ruling where non has been made does not help the opinion.

Reply Parent Score: 2