Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 18:08 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Permalink for comment 392317
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
And this is wrong why? Apple should and is obligated (to their share holders) to protect to their property any way they can. If that means locking OSX so tight it won't run on anything that hasn't passed through Job's ass, so be it. I don't see a problem with that. I would do the same if I didn't want my product running on a competitors machine as it affects my bottom line. Apple is a business not a charity, they are not obligated to give away what they paid for in the first place just because a few geeks think its their god given right.