Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Permalink for comment 392587
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-02-15
Moron,*YOU DON'T* have the right to run the OS we want on the hardware *YOU* want unless it's a GPL'd OS like Linux or something similar where you are granted permission to do so.
Where do you base your claims? Do you say EULAs are always valid and can and should be enforceable? If so then it'd be interesting to hear some arguments as to why you think so.
Besides, do you understand the implications of such? If EULAs were indeed found to be legally binding then do expect to start seeing EULAs in DVDs, CDs, electronic books and so on.
You alt 2600 warezing assholes did enough damage by getting involved with the DeCSS trial.
How do you know that they use illegal copies? I've seen several people mentioning that they've actually bought a retail copy of OSX and used that.
Do us all a favor and f--k off now....
And you are somehow better than all others just simply because you can throw out a whole bunch of baseless insults at people and don't back up a single of your claim with any kind of an argument?