Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
Legal While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Permalink for comment 392622
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not OSnews, PSnews
by tylerdurden on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 20:38 UTC in reply to "RE: Not OSnews, PSnews"
tylerdurden
Member since:
2009-03-17

... except for the "tiny itsy bitsy" detail that what you claimed is not what Pysstar is going to court for.

People should have the right to run whatever they want in the computers they own, that is probably a no-brainer argument. However, that is not what Pysstar is going to court over. They are simply trying to re-sell other people's product without the authorization of the manufacturer.


Twooo very different issues IMHO. Trying to piggyback Pysstar as a champion of freedom is simply hubris. Especially, when Pysstar is going against the interests of those in the OSX86 community to begin with.

Edited 2009-11-03 20:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1