Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
Law and Order While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Permalink for comment 392820
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BallmerKnowsBest
Member since:
2008-06-02

Pysstar can go pound sand and come up with their own code if they don't want to comply with the wishes of people who have stated clearly the fact they don't want their code to be commercially distributed by people who had diddly squat to do with it.


If Apple is unhappy with the way Psystar uses their code, then maybe they should... oh, I dunno... STOP SELLING IT TO THEM?!?!?

A radical, outside-the-box idea, I know - but by God, it's crazy enough that it just might work!

Apple's just acting like a spoiled little kid who gives a toy away, then demands it back 5 minutes later.

Edited 2009-11-04 17:00 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3