Linked by Pobrecito Hablador on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:19 UTC
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris One of the advantages of ZFS is that it doesn't need a fsck. Replication, self-healing and scrubbing are a much better alternative. After a few years of ZFS life, can we say it was the correct decision? The reports in the mailing list are a good indicator of what happens in the real world, and it appears that once again, reality beats theory. The author of the article analyzes the implications of not having a fsck tool and tries to explain why he thinks Sun will add one at some point.
Permalink for comment 392869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by DOSguy
by dvzt on Wed 4th Nov 2009 21:02 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by DOSguy"
Member since:

To be truly sure, which hardware plays by the rules and dont breaks any standards, you have to buy Enterprise stuff.

No you don't. You can use any kind of disks assuming they are not broken.

Reply Parent Score: 2