by Morgan on Fri 6th Nov 2009 13:12 UTC
in reply to "Um, duh..."
Member since:
2005-06-29
I couldn't agree more. My position has been that the hackintosh community has been largely ignored by Apple because they do it for fun. They aren't hurting Apple's margins all that much, and they aren't trying to make a buck from their efforts.
However, I don't consider Psystar to be a part of the hackintosh community at all. They take what the community has done, try to make a profit off of it, and that only hurts all of us in the end. Sure, it would be nice if their actions had the side effect of rendering the Apple SLAs unenforceable, but that's a pipe dream really. They are eventually going to lose their case or settle out of court. After that, Apple may start paying more attention to the hackintosh community--and not in a nice way--so they can prevent another Psystar from popping up.
Honestly, I wish they had never started their silly lawsuits but if not them, someone else would have done the same. Greed is a powerful motivator after all.
Member since:
2005-06-29
I couldn't agree more. My position has been that the hackintosh community has been largely ignored by Apple because they do it for fun. They aren't hurting Apple's margins all that much, and they aren't trying to make a buck from their efforts.
However, I don't consider Psystar to be a part of the hackintosh community at all. They take what the community has done, try to make a profit off of it, and that only hurts all of us in the end. Sure, it would be nice if their actions had the side effect of rendering the Apple SLAs unenforceable, but that's a pipe dream really. They are eventually going to lose their case or settle out of court. After that, Apple may start paying more attention to the hackintosh community--and not in a nice way--so they can prevent another Psystar from popping up.
Honestly, I wish they had never started their silly lawsuits but if not them, someone else would have done the same. Greed is a powerful motivator after all.