Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Nov 2009 23:05 UTC
Linux As we all know, Mac OS X has support for what is called 'fat binaries'. These are binaries that can carry code for for instance multiple architectures - in the case of the Mac, PowerPC and x86. Ryan Gordon was working on an implementation of fat binaries for Linux - but due to the conduct of the Linux maintainers, Gordon has halted the effort.
Permalink for comment 393507
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

- Reduces memory use

Is this supposed to be a joke?

- Bugfixes. If a security vulnerability is fixed in a library, every app benefits without having to be updated.

Meanwhile, every app using that lib is vulnerable. Congrats!

- Yes, drive space. Many mobile devices still have root filesystem on small fast flash drive.

What a killer feature! Meanwhile, other systems like MacOSX can exist on small mobile devices quite well despite universal binaries. Of course, you can strip unwanted architectures from universal binaries.

"If you want to defend 70's tech then go ahead, but I'm sick of this
attitude by Linux advocates who believe that people who criticize Unix/Linux are stupid.

Not really stupid - rather, it's about a knee jerk reaction when leaving their comfort zone. They mostly have experience with click-and-run installers, and want the same on Linux too. And these days, we have many click-and-run installers for Linux available. There is nothing in Linux that prevents you from making them (or makes it exceedingly hard, either).

Fully agree with the first poster. Somehow Linux people always come up with good reasons for server or mobile devices that makes it impossible to adopt something that would be user friendly for a desktop situation - and then, they wonder why "the year of Linux on the desktop" still has not arrived ..

Reply Parent Score: 2