Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Nov 2009 09:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 393931
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-07
That's the whole point. Unfortunately so far in the comments, like usual, the discussion has gone into OS politics.
These guys intentionally executed viruses that 8/10 didn't need permission elevation (functioned at local users level) and Windows rightfully allowed them to execute. I mean we're techies here, we understand there's no magic involved in preventing something like this. However, Sophos can (ab)use it as a marketing tool when selling AV to normal users.