Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 14:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 395962
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-07
The two are not mutually exclusive and I'm sure Microsoft will be able to afford both at the same time.
Hurting your competitor is every day business. Sometimes with commercials (Apple, Verizon, etc.) and sometimes through stealing customers or content providers by providing financial incentives.
I don't see anything out of ordinary here. Microsoft is buying exclusive content, no different from exclusive games on consoles.
Is it all to us, as in end-users' benefit? Well, that is debatable, but generally speaking the more heated the competition the better. I don't like a Google monopoly on search as much as I don't like a Microsoft monopoly on Operating Systems.
Edited 2009-11-23 15:41 UTC