Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 14:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 395967
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-16
Last year was it that Murdoch made the Wall Street Jouranl a pay site again? You can read the first paragraph for free, but need an account to read the rest. Unless you followed an link from Google, then you get the whole story for free. I decided to test this for myself to see if it was true, and is seems to be.
From Google News I got this story;
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html?mod=WSJ_hpp...
From http://online.wsj.com I got this;
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125898768560860537.html?mod=WSJ_hpp...
Both links look the same, but from Google I got the whole story and only a paragraph from wsj.com. It's their own site and they made this loop hole on purpose and they leave it there while Murdoche is spouting all this nonsense.
I used the same browser, so even if it was a cookie or something from Google, then I should have still got the second story for free, but wsj.com is allowing the story for free if you are referred by Goggle.