Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Nov 2009 14:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 396267
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-15
I know personally I use either the ABC (Australian govt funded) or the BBC news, so Mr Murdoch can remove his content and it will make zero difference to me.
In my opinion he can charge for his content if he wishes that is his right if he owns the content. From what I have seen of his paper creations I wont be subscribing.
I think that if an organisation removes content from Google less people will find the content in question and will more than likely not even be aware of it being there. Thus these organisations will have to spend more to advertise their content in other media or different locations. If they think Bing will bring in the $$$ I sincerely doubt it as Bing just does not make the grade and the momentum is behind Google is hard to breach.
It sounds to me like do this or I will take my bat and ball home and no one will play!!!