Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Nov 2009 17:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 396454
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-03
I find two things particularly amusing in this article:
One is the statement that Mac OS X lacks a Paint.NET equivalent. This is false, since there is (at least) Pixelmator.
Or do you mean there is no free Paint.NET equivalent? I like free software as much as the next guy, but Pixelmator costs $60, which is very reasonable considering it is an excellent app.
Or you can always install the GIMP (which is fugly as hell on the Mac - as every GTK app outside Linux, in fact).
The second is saying that the GIMP is too high-end for the Ubuntu audience... That is a barrel of laughs just by itself.
Not only the GIMP isn't that high-end (or complicated really) nor is Ubuntu's audience so technically impaired that it can't figure out the GIMP in five minutes. Does the mythical "Joe Sixpack" use Ubuntu? No.
Of course this is merely about the default installation, so it's mostly irrelevant. Every one on the Ubuntu audience knows how to install packages from the repository.