Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 00:05 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
KDE We all know what KDE stands for, right? Unless you're new here, you'll know that it stands for the K Desktop Environment. While this certainly covers a large chunk of what KDE stands for, it has increasingly lost its meaning over the past few years. Consequently, the KDE team has decided to 'reposition' the KDE brand.
Permalink for comment 396574
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Problem they have is KDE 4
by lemur2 on Thu 26th Nov 2009 08:58 UTC in reply to "Problem they have is KDE 4"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

The problem they have is surely KDE 4? I think its beautiful, and its most creative as a redesign of the UI. But no way am I ever going to offer this stuff to a naive user, any more than I would start them off with fluxbox or enlightenment, which are also both great, in their own ways.

I don't know what they were thinking of. Not in terms of the thing itself, but in terms of the people who were going to have to use it. You just cannot do this stuff to the mass market. And yes, I have fired it up several times, quite liked it, decided fluxbox was still the main choice, and each time wondered what on earth I would say to a naive user if he/she were confronted with it.

And answer came there none.


Pfffft.

I have introduced KDE 4 to quite a number of new users in the past month or so.

Not one of them had any particular trouble with it.

It works great.

Reply Parent Score: 4