Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Nov 2009 17:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 396594
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-07
I agree that Paint.NET is really an interesting product. I myself do not use it for working on photos, since I can use Photoshop, PS Elements or PhotoStudio. But it is very handy for may graphic works for webdesign (cutting, merging, using layers...) which are more a pain in PS!
On the Mac I do not feel its lacking: Photoshop Elements and PhotoStudio or GraphicConverter perfectly suit my needs.
Of course if you want such a nice product also for free, then the choice gets more restricted.
On Linux and Unix in genereal I agree hoewever. I am still not yet a friend of GIMP. It has many awkward spots. It does not behave like one expects and misses some important features I have under Photoshop! While it has tons of other features. GIMP is for my photographic needs not a substitute even for venerand PS6.
When I work on Unix, I thus feel the lack of BOTH Paint.NET and Photoshop!
I will continue to work on my two tools, LaternaMagica and PRICE which are done in GNUstep and run also on Mac, but it will be a long way.
LaternaMagica started as an XV and GraphicConverter replacement and I think I will continue to pursue that for now.