Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Permalink for comment 396675
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: And what if...
by NeoX on Thu 26th Nov 2009 23:36 UTC in reply to "And what if..."
Member since:

Absolutely agree. While the article somewhat mocks Apple for considering Pystar a threat, since they only sold 768 machines, they still have a right to protect their IP. It does not matter if these morons sold 2 machines and made no money, they still did it dishonestly and illegally and could have an impact on Apple's brand name and reputation.

I really do not understand why all the negativeness towards Apple protecting their IP, especially from so called "journalists".

If I had created a successful business and brand name, you bet I would protect it from shady outfits like Pystar.

Reply Parent Score: 3