Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Permalink for comment 396684
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Sure, Apple won 1 case, but the case in Floriduh could likely go the other way, knowing Floriduh's legal system. That's probably why they want California to rule on it.

Further though, will this affect the company in Germany that was/is in the business of clones? I believe that the ruling wouldn't be so easily decided since Apple tends to work from a U.S. point of view on everything.

In the end, it all comes down to how much potential there is to hurt the company. Whether you like the company or not, your product could be the next to be used against your wishes. So, in a way, this is a look at how any of us might react.

Reply Score: 4