Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Nov 2009 17:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 396694
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
WTF is wrong with that statement? It is a fact, pure and simple.
Umm, well you see Mono apps written in Gtk# are GTK+ applications, and therefore integrate with KDE desktops just as well as other KDE apps. You do know the difference between language runtime (Mono) and widget toolkit (GTK+/Qt) right? Now if you say WinForms, then yes that is correct, WinForms applications are very foreign looking on a Linux desktop. However as much as you don't like it, the fact remains that Mono/Gtk# applications integrate into a Linux system just as well as any other Gtk+ application written in any other language.
Additionally, there ARE Mono bindings for KDE/Qt known as Qyoto, which you can see for yourself here - http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages/Qyoto
So your snarky but not Mono at the end of your argument was uncalled for and deliberately untrue.