Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 21:53 UTC
Legal We've got some progress in the other legal case Apple is involved in. The California case, Apple vs. Psystar, is more or less a done deal, but the Florida case, Psystar vs. Apple, is only just beginning. As it promised it would do, Apple has now asked the court in California to either dismiss the Florida case, or transfer it to California. Apple is also asking for a permanent injuction against Psystar. Through this motion, we also gain some juicy insight into Psystar's sales projections - and more interestingly, how many machines the clone maker actually sold.
Permalink for comment 396733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
3/4 of a kilo
by SuperDaveOsbourne on Fri 27th Nov 2009 10:05 UTC
SuperDaveOsbourne
Member since:
2007-06-24

Not much to worry about, apple is clearly about making sure others don't do this in the future. If you don't protect it, you can't claim it later. Its simply a matter of what Apple had to do. As for Pystar, they are less than noble, hardly worth the time I type, and clearly a failed business attempt.

Reply Score: 1