Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Nov 2009 17:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 396841
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-25
I do not agree. That is not a replacement for Gimp or close to Paint.NET. Tuxpaint is a more serious and useful paint application. I hope the Gnome mentality has not gripped that project or all we can expect is a MSPaint clone.
MSPaint is not a photo or paint application, it is a joke and should not be emulated. Gimp may be overkill and too difficult to use, but under delivering (notepad, mspaint, cmd, IE, etc) is worse. Something like Paint.NET is very close to ideal.
If you meant that it is working toward the feature set of Paint.NET and will be ideal when it reaches that point then yes, I agree, that would be nice.