Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 00:09 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Permalink for comment 396858
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Well, no they can't so there will be code divergence, maintenance issues and Linux and OS X inevitably won't get feature parity.
No. If you're going to have a cross-platform app then do so. If not, just admit to everyone that it isn't. Simple.
I couldn't give a shit. If an application is cross-platform then it's cross-platform. No, you don't have to lose users. With a proper cross-platform development framework then it's more than achieveable, and it then makes a limited amount of platform specific features possible and easier to maintain.
See above. You don't have to. That 'lowest common denominator' thing is just plain crap. The problem is that Firefox is doing it wrong.