Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Nov 2009 23:39 UTC
General Development Even though I'm not a programmer, I still know that while some programmers like the idea of graphical programming, whereas others shun the concept completely, opting for a more hands-on approach. While Microsoft is quite active in the field of graphical programming, the company's own high-level coders aren't very keen on the idea.
Permalink for comment 396994
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Too vague.
by JMcCarthy on Mon 30th Nov 2009 00:24 UTC
Member since:

I'm not entirely sure what's being talked about here, but if they're simply referring to programming environments then I kind of agree.

Notepad is a little too ascetic for me, I use emacs. I think a decent shell + text editor + standard *nix utilities are the pinnacle of software development, no doubt they're harder to master, but when you do, there isn't a GUI IDE that I know of that can match them in speed, ease of use, or features, and I'm fairly familiar with Visual Studio, XCode and have had the occasional foray with Eclipse & NetBeans.

When I write GUI programs though, I will use Qt Designer or Glade. The lines seem kind of blurred to me, but I wouldn't consider these programming tools, more like design.

Reply Score: 5